Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2109
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGuillén, Pablo-
dc.creatorSchwieren, Christiane-
dc.creatorStaffiero, Gianandrea-
dc.date2007-11-14T08:52:15Z-
dc.date2007-11-14T08:52:15Z-
dc.date2004-
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T00:58:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-31T00:58:35Z-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/2109-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10261/2109-
dc.descriptionUsing a step-level public good game, we analyze the effects on contributions of having played under a sanctioning regime. We find that ”educational” effects, in terms of learning a particular way to coordinate towards ”good” equilibria, are more relevant than motivational ”crowding out” effects, whereby cooperating to avoid sanctions spoils intrinsic incentives. If groups vote, they decide to remove the costly sanctioning regime; then they cooperate as much as in automatic removal only when this decision entails a clear ”trust” message.-
dc.descriptionPeer reviewed-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationIESA Working Paper Series-
dc.relationWP 04-04-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectPublic Good-
dc.subjectStep-level-
dc.subjectSanctioning Institution-
dc.subjectCooperation-
dc.subjectEducation-
dc.subjectTrust-
dc.titleFeeding the Leviathan-
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo-
Appears in Collections:Digital Csic

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.