Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18385
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorDröge, Susanne-
dc.creatorSchröder, Philipp J. H.-
dc.date2005-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T06:59:42Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-16T06:59:42Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-16-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18385-
dc.identifierppn:505101815-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/18385-
dc.descriptionThe ad valorem versus unit taxes debate has traditionally emphasized tax yield. For this criterion, ad valorem taxes outperform unit taxes in terms of welfare for a wide range of imperfect competition settings, including Dixit-Stiglitz monopolistic competition. Yet, in a number of policy fields, such as environmental, health or trade economics, policy makers apply taxes to target the production/consumption volume in an industry, i.e. aim at a certain corrective effect rather than tax yield. This paper compares the two tax instruments with respect to equal corrective-effect in a Dixit-Stiglitz setting with love of variety, entry, exit, and redistribution of tax revenues. We find that unit taxes lead to more firms in the industry, less output per firm, less tax revenue, but higher welfare compared to ad valorem taxes.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDeutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Berlin-
dc.relationDIW-Diskussionspapiere 534-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.subjectH23-
dc.subjectL13-
dc.subjectddc:330-
dc.subjectExternalities-
dc.subjectMonopolistic competition-
dc.subjectTaxes-
dc.subjectSpecific Taxes-
dc.subjectWelfare-
dc.titleCorrective Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes: A Welfare Comparison-
dc.typedoc-type:workingPaper-
Appears in Collections:EconStor

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.