Ten years after : what is special about transition countries?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19465

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.creator	Gros, Daniel	-
dc.creator	Suhrcke, Marc	-
dc.date	2000	-
dc.date.accessioned	2013-10-16T07:05:09Z	-
dc.date.available	2013-10-16T07:05:09Z	-
dc.date.issued	2013-10-16	-
dc.identifier	http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19465	-
dc.identifier	ppn:311582559	-
dc.identifier	RePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26236	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/19465	-
dc.description	Most countries commonly classified as ?in transition? are still recognisably different from other countries with a similar income per capita in some respects: a larger share of their work force is in industry, they use more energy, they have a more extensive infrastructure and invest more in schooling. However, in terms of the ?software? necessary for a market economy, two groups emerge: the countries that are candidates for EU membership seem to have partly completed the transition. By contrast, the countries from the former Soviet Union that form the CIS and the BALKAN countries, are still lagging behind especially in terms of the enforcement of property rights and the development of financial markets.	-
dc.language	eng	-
dc.publisher		-
dc.relation	HWWA Discussion Paper 86	-
dc.rights	http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen	-
dc.subject	ddc:330	-
dc.subject	Übergangswirtschaft	-
dc.subject	Wirtschaftliche Anpassung	-
dc.subject	Vergleich	-
dc.subject	Osteuropa	-
dc.title	Ten years after : what is special about transition countries?	-
dc.type	doc-type:workingPaper	-
Appears in Collections:	EconStor

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

DSpace JSPUI