Is the Green Good Life Achievable in a World of Sovereign States?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/123456789/1857

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.creator	Kerri Woods	-
dc.date	2004	-
dc.date.accessioned	2013-05-29T20:48:44Z	-
dc.date.available	2013-05-29T20:48:44Z	-
dc.date.issued	2013-05-30	-
dc.identifier	http://www.sharp.arts.gla.ac.uk/issue3/woods.htm	-
dc.identifier	http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=17424542&date=2004&volume=Three&issue=&spage=	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/1857	-
dc.description	This paper engages two different discourses of the good life[2] in conversation: what Beitz calls 'the classical theory of sovereignty', and green political theory.[3] Both have been concerned with questions as to how to realise the good life, but have recognised different obstacles to that end, and have taken relatively little notice of one another's insights and inquiries. This neglect has had the consequence of impoverishing green conceptions of the institutional arrangements required to deliver environmental sustainability, a necessary if not sufficient condition of the green good life. Likewise, classical theorists of sovereignty have been remiss in their failure to recognise the need to enlarge their understanding of threats to human security by including environmental concerns.	-
dc.publisher	University of Glasgow	-
dc.source	eSharp	-
dc.subject	Not available	-
dc.title	Is the Green Good Life Achievable in a World of Sovereign States?	-
Appears in Collections:	Arts and Architecture

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

DSpace JSPUI