GM ethical decision making in practice

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/123456789/4468

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.creator	Donald Bruce	-
dc.date	2002	-
dc.date.accessioned	2013-05-30T11:15:33Z	-
dc.date.available	2013-05-30T11:15:33Z	-
dc.date.issued	2013-05-30	-
dc.identifier	http://www.int-res.com/articles/esep/2002/E19.pdf	-
dc.identifier	http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=16118014&date=2002&volume=2002&issue=&spage=75	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/4468	-
dc.description	Celia Deane-Drummond's case for wisdom as an approach to ethical decision making and her doubts about case-oriented methodology are critiqued with reference to the SRT Project's Engineering Genesis study. Its approach is explored in practical decisions on various real life examples of genetic modification in crops and animals. It involved both intrinsic and consequential approaches, and identified key value positions behind different policies and stakeholders. The paper also clarifies the relationship between reactive (cost-benefit) and precautionary risk assessment, explaining their strengths and limitations, and the role of underlying values in both forms of risk decision making.	-
dc.publisher	Inter-Research	-
dc.source	Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics	-
dc.title	GM ethical decision making in practice	-
Appears in Collections:	Science General

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

DSpace JSPUI