Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/123456789/5663
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJürgen Neyer-
dc.date2000-
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-30T13:13:24Z-
dc.date.available2013-05-30T13:13:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-30-
dc.identifierhttp://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-006.htm-
dc.identifierhttp://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=10275193&date=2000&volume=4&issue=&spage=6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/5663-
dc.descriptionThe implementation of European law is widely regarded as a technical matter primarily dealt with in intra-administrative procedures and removed from the impact of public opinion. In European risk regulation, however, public concern can easily become very important, to the point of dominating administrative logic. The BSE crisis is a case in point: it emphasises the need to regard policy implementation as a political process which develops through the tension between supranational legal norms, governmental interests and public concerns. It furthermore underlines that effectiveness and the social acceptance of rules must be viewed as two sides of one coin. If public concerns shall not become the Achilles heel of effective European risk regulation, the EC is well advised to attach increasing importance to the insight that effective law is inherently political law.-
dc.publisherECSA-Austria-
dc.sourceEuropean Integration Online Papers-
dc.subjectrisk regulation-
dc.subjectpublic opinion-
dc.subjectBSE crisis-
dc.subjectimplementation-
dc.subjectlaw-
dc.subjectpolitical science-
dc.titleThe Regulation of Risks and the Power of the People: Lessons from the BSE Crisis-
Appears in Collections:Law and Political Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.