Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/123456789/5948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBecker, Tabea-
dc.creatorPeschel, Corinna-
dc.date2003-
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-30T13:52:04Z-
dc.date.available2013-05-30T13:52:04Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-30-
dc.identifierhttp://www.linguistik-online.de/16_03/index.html-
dc.identifierhttp://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=openurl&genre=article&issn=16153014&date=2003&volume=16&issue=4&spage=85-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/5948-
dc.descriptionIn this paper we attempt to determine the criteria speakers apply in morphologically or syntactically ambiguous cases. In German separable vs. inseparable verbs can be included in these cases. Although most grammar books present patterns or rules which give the impression of relatively clear cut cases, in contrast literal usage in every day life seems to hint to the contrary. In an empirical study with 120 students we demonstrated that separable verbs are a grammatical entity where even native speakers differ greatly in their linguistic behaviour and choices. Their behaviour also reveals considerable incongruities with rules ascribed by grammarians. In addition we found the following factors which influence the way speakers use complex verbs: While stress plays a major role (as pointed out in most grammar books), habitual use or analogous treatment enter as important factors. Semantic criteria are not heeded or only to a small degree, contrary to the postulations in some grammar books. Our results support the hypothesis that for syntactical processing, criteria or cues from various linguistic levels (phonological, morphological, semantic) are used. Since those cues can be contradictory to one another, insecure or differing linguistic judgements ensue. Thus we gained insights into how syntactic knowledge is stored and processed.-
dc.publisherEuropean University Viadrina, Faculty for Cultural Sciences-
dc.sourceLinguistik online-
dc.subjectcase of doubt-
dc.subjectsprachlicher zweifelsfall-
dc.subjectseparable verb-
dc.subjectinseparable verb-
dc.title"Wir bitten Sie das nicht misszugeneralisieren". Sprachverhalten in grammatischen Zweifelsfällen am Beispiel trennbarer und nicht-trennbarer Verben-
Appears in Collections:Languages and Literatures

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.