Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/5160
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBier, Vicki M.-
dc.date2004-05-28T19:25:49Z-
dc.date2004-05-28T19:25:49Z-
dc.date1979-07-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:38:02Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:38:02Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5160-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionThere are many public policy settings in which random assignment of clients to experimental and control groups is not feasible. I will discuss one such case, and the alternative method of assignment which was actually used. The vulnerability of this method to intentional selection bias will be explored using Markov methods of analysis.-
dc.descriptionPrepared under Grant Number 78NI-AX-0007 from the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice.-
dc.format1746 bytes-
dc.format1997049 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center-
dc.relationOperations Research Center Working Paper;OR 090-79-
dc.titleMarkov Analysis of an Alternative to Pure Random Assignment-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.