Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/5173
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMinkoff, Alan S.-
dc.date2004-05-28T19:26:26Z-
dc.date2004-05-28T19:26:26Z-
dc.date1981-12-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:38:08Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:38:08Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5173-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionFlexibility or adaptivity in public program evaluation can lead to large savings in time and money, with little or no loss in accuracy, if used properly. In this paper, guidelines are suggested for the employment of classical statistics in adaptive evaluation methodology. Through the case setting of a flu clinic, candidate techniques are demonstrated for handling problems in hypothesis testing, estimation, adaptive allocation of information-gathering resources, and before-and-after-type comparisons. In some cases, classical statistics proves quite adaptable to the requirements of the situation, while in others, its introduction is more artificial.-
dc.format1744 bytes-
dc.format1895489 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Operations Research Center-
dc.relationOperations Research Center Working Paper;OR 111-81-
dc.titleAdaptive Evaluation Methodology Prototypes: Examples-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.