Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/5978Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Mataric, Maja | - |
| dc.date | 2004-10-04T14:25:16Z | - |
| dc.date | 2004-10-04T14:25:16Z | - |
| dc.date | 1991-10-01 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-09T02:42:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-10-09T02:42:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-10-09 | - |
| dc.identifier | AIM-1322 | - |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/5978 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721 | - |
| dc.description | This paper analyzes the suitability of reinforcement learning (RL) for both programming and adapting situated agents. We discuss two RL algorithms: Q-learning and the Bucket Brigade. We introduce a special case of the Bucket Brigade, and analyze and compare its performance to Q in a number of experiments. Next we discuss the key problems of RL: time and space complexity, input generalization, sensitivity to parameter values, and selection of the reinforcement function. We address the tradeoffs between the built-in and learned knowledge and the number of training examples required by a learning algorithm. Finally, we suggest directions for future research. | - |
| dc.format | 13 p. | - |
| dc.format | 1444645 bytes | - |
| dc.format | 1130480 bytes | - |
| dc.format | application/postscript | - |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | en_US | - |
| dc.relation | AIM-1322 | - |
| dc.subject | reinforcement | - |
| dc.subject | learning | - |
| dc.subject | situated agents | - |
| dc.subject | inputsgeneralization | - |
| dc.subject | complexity | - |
| dc.subject | built-in knowledge | - |
| dc.title | A Comparative Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Methods | - |
| Appears in Collections: | MIT Items | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
