Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/6200
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSussman, Gerald Jay-
dc.creatorMcDermott, Drew Vincent-
dc.date2004-10-04T14:45:37Z-
dc.date2004-10-04T14:45:37Z-
dc.date1972-04-01-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:44:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:44:05Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierAIM-255a-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6200-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionThis paper is a critique of a computer programming language, Carl Hewitts PLANNER, a formalism designed especially to cope with the problems that Artificial Intelligence encounters. It is our contention that the backtrack control structure that is the backbone of PLANNER is particular, automatic backtracking encourages inefficient algorithms, conceals what is happening from the user, and misleads him with primitives having powerful names whose power is only superficial. An alternative, a programming language called CONNIVER which avoids these problems, is presented from the point of view of this critique.-
dc.format32 p.-
dc.format12163426 bytes-
dc.format901800 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/postscript-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.relationAIM-255a-
dc.titleWhy Conniving is Better than Plannng-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.