Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/6898
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMoore, Robert Carter-
dc.date2004-10-20T20:05:41Z-
dc.date2004-10-20T20:05:41Z-
dc.date1975-12-01-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:47:29Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:47:29Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierAITR-347-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6898-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionOne very useful idea in AI research has been the notion of an explicit model of a problem situation. Procedural deduction languages, such as PLANNER, have been valuable tools for building these models. But PLANNER and its relatives are very limited in their ability to describe situations which are only partially specified. This thesis explores methods of increasing the ability of procedural deduction systems to deal with incomplete knowledge. The thesis examines in detail, problems involving negation, implication, disjunction, quantification, and equality. Control structure issues and the problem of modelling change under incomplete knowledge are also considered. Extensive comparisons are also made with systems for mechanica theorem proving.-
dc.format10580006 bytes-
dc.format8308773 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/postscript-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.relationAITR-347-
dc.titleReasoning from Incomplete Knowledge in a Procedural Deduction System-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.