Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721.1/6978
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorWu, Henry M.-
dc.date2004-10-20T20:12:01Z-
dc.date2004-10-20T20:12:01Z-
dc.date1989-04-01-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T02:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-09T02:48:01Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-09-
dc.identifierAITR-1103-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/6978-
dc.identifier.urihttp://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721-
dc.descriptionThe Scheme86 and the HP Precision Architectures represent different trends in computer processor design. The former uses wide micro-instructions, parallel hardware, and a low latency memory interface. The latter encourages pipelined implementation and visible interlocks. To compare the merits of these approaches, algorithms frequently encountered in numerical and symbolic computation were hand-coded for each architecture. Timings were done in simulators and the results were evaluated to determine the speed of each design. Based on these measurements, conclusions were drawn as to which aspects of each architecture are suitable for a high- performance computer.-
dc.format7085809 bytes-
dc.format2582214 bytes-
dc.formatapplication/postscript-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_US-
dc.relationAITR-1103-
dc.titlePerformance Evaluation of the Scheme 86 and HP Precision Architecture-
Appears in Collections:MIT Items

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.