أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط

dc.creator Goette, Lorenz
dc.creator Huffman, David
dc.creator Fehr, Ernst
dc.date 2003
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:09:08Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:09:08Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20164
dc.identifier ppn:374481067
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/10419/20164
dc.description In many occupations workers? labor supply choices are constrained by institutional rules regulating labor time and effort provision. This renders explicit tests of the neoclassical theory of labor supply difficult. Here we present evidence from studies examining labor supply responses in ?neoclassical environments? in which workers are free to choose when and how much to work. Despite the favorable environment the results cast doubt on the neoclassical model. They are, however, consistent with a model of reference dependent preferences exhibiting loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher
dc.relation IZA Discussion paper series 927
dc.rights http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen
dc.subject B49
dc.subject J22
dc.subject ddc:330
dc.subject labor supply
dc.subject intertemporal substitution
dc.subject loss aversion
dc.subject reference dependent
dc.subject Arbeitsangebot
dc.subject Arbeitszeit
dc.subject Zeitpräferenz
dc.subject Risikoaversion
dc.subject Prospect Theory
dc.subject Theorie
dc.subject Deutschland
dc.title Loss aversion and labor supply
dc.type doc-type:workingPaper


الملفات في هذه المادة

الملفات الحجم الصيغة عرض

لا توجد أي ملفات مرتبطة بهذه المادة.

هذه المادة تبدو في المجموعات التالية:

أعرض تسجيلة المادة بشكل مبسط