DSpace Repository

Intelligence by Design: Principles of Modularity and Coordination for Engineerin

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bryson, Joanna J.
dc.date 2004-10-20T20:29:10Z
dc.date 2004-10-20T20:29:10Z
dc.date 2001-09-01
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-09T02:48:10Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-09T02:48:10Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-09
dc.identifier AITR-2002-003
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/7080
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1721
dc.description All intelligence relies on search --- for example, the search for an intelligent agent's next action. Search is only likely to succeed in resource-bounded agents if they have already been biased towards finding the right answer. In artificial agents, the primary source of bias is engineering. This dissertation describes an approach, Behavior-Oriented Design (BOD) for engineering complex agents. A complex agent is one that must arbitrate between potentially conflicting goals or behaviors. Behavior-oriented design builds on work in behavior-based and hybrid architectures for agents, and the object oriented approach to software engineering. The primary contributions of this dissertation are: 1.The BOD architecture: a modular architecture with each module providing specialized representations to facilitate learning. This includes one pre-specified module and representation for action selection or behavior arbitration. The specialized representation underlying BOD action selection is Parallel-rooted, Ordered, Slip-stack Hierarchical (POSH) reactive plans. 2.The BOD development process: an iterative process that alternately scales the agent's capabilities then optimizes the agent for simplicity, exploiting tradeoffs between the component representations. This ongoing process for controlling complexity not only provides bias for the behaving agent, but also facilitates its maintenance and extendibility. The secondary contributions of this dissertation include two implementations of POSH action selection, a procedure for identifying useful idioms in agent architectures and using them to distribute knowledge across agent paradigms, several examples of applying BOD idioms to established architectures, an analysis and comparison of the attributes and design trends of a large number of agent architectures, a comparison of biological (particularly mammalian) intelligence to artificial agent architectures, a novel model of primate transitive inference, and many other examples of BOD agents and BOD development.
dc.format 232 p.
dc.format 4544378 bytes
dc.format 1027952 bytes
dc.format application/postscript
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en_US
dc.relation AITR-2002-003
dc.subject AI
dc.title Intelligence by Design: Principles of Modularity and Coordination for Engineerin


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account