DSpace Repository

Transboundary river floods : vulnerability of continents, international river basins and countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Wolf, Aaron T.
dc.contributor Walker, Gregg
dc.contributor Steel, Brent
dc.contributor Hostetler, Steve
dc.contributor Doel, Ron
dc.date 2007-01-22T17:19:51Z
dc.date 2007-01-22T17:19:51Z
dc.date 2006-12-06
dc.date 2007-01-22T17:19:51Z
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-16T07:44:10Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-16T07:44:10Z
dc.date.issued 2013-10-16
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/1957/3821
dc.identifier.uri http://koha.mediu.edu.my:8181/xmlui/handle/1957/3821
dc.description Graduation date: 2007
dc.description Floods are the most frequent and damaging of all types of natural disasters and annually affect the lives of millions all over the globe. However, researchers seem to have overlooked the fact that floods do not recognize national boundaries. Therefore, the phenomena of shared, or transboundary floods occurring in international river basins (IRBs) is rarely touched upon. Consequently, vulnerability to shared floods is poorly understood and not much is known about the present quantity and quality of institutional capacity to deal with such events. Hence the primary purpose of the present work is to fill this gap in knowledge. We explore transboundary river flood events and related institutional capacity in more detail, starting at a global scale, zooming in on international river basins (IRBs) and ending with a country-scale perspective. The first section assesses how many of all floods were riverine and how much of these were shared between two or more countries. The results show that transboundary floods are more severe in their magnitude, affect larger areas, result in higher death tolls, and cause more financial damage than non-shared river floods do. The second section reveals an alarmingly low institutional capacity related to transboundary river floods: more than 15% of the IRBs do not have any type of institutional capacity in the form of a river basin institution, nor any focused on floods. The third section examines flood events, international water treaties signed and institutions created in the Netherlands and Mozambique. The comparison indicates that lower levels of development or the absence of development capital do not necessarily have to result in future (shared) flood-related disasters. Collectively, these results significantly increase our current knowledge on vulnerability to –transboundary– river floods and indicate that there might be more need for official international institutions dealing with these events. However, selecting the one country, continent or IRB that is the most vulnerable to –transboundary– river floods is impossible since the answer greatly depends upon the specific definition of vulnerability. This indicates that vulnerability to floods is a complex phenomenon that cannot be explained by using the results of only this study.
dc.language en_US
dc.subject Floods
dc.subject International river basin
dc.subject Vulnerability
dc.subject Transboundary
dc.subject Water institutions
dc.subject Netherlands
dc.subject Water management
dc.subject Mozambique
dc.title Transboundary river floods : vulnerability of continents, international river basins and countries
dc.type Thesis

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account